|
|
| Sample
Outputs of WorkRelationships' Interpersonal Risk Management System |
|
Company Z:
Industry:
Real estate/Construction
Employees: 14,000
Situation: A CFO of a large real /estate/ construction company
contacted WorkRelationships' after her company was hit with two
negligent retention lawsuits in six months; this was on top of several
violence in the workplace incidents that resulted in a significant
increase in their worker's comp claims. In particular, the corporate
counsel was interested in getting a handle on the employee turmoil
which had escalated as part of a failed merger. She was also looking
to evaluate the effectiveness and the efficiency of their existing
employment policies and procedures as well as the consistency of
their application across business units.
|
|
The
Interpersonal Risk Profile: The CFO
requested that each business unit manager go through the Interpersonal
Risk Audit and submit each of their reports for their corporate
counsel to review. The results of the Interpersonal Risk Audits
varied dramatically from business unit to business unit, indicating
a need for an overall centralized location of human resource oversight.
There were,
though, some similarities across units; workplace violence prevention
and substance abuse awareness, for example, were consistently neglected
in spite of the fact that construction is a high risk industry for
employee conduct problems.
|
|
Click
to see sample results:

Click
to see sample workplace violence recommendations
|
|
Consultation: A
follow-up consultation with the CFO and corporate counsel revealed
a strong need to integrate the disperate cultures of their real
estate and construction division that were coexisting uneasily and
often conflictually. WorkRelationships' agreed to work with their
corporate human resource office to review existing employment policies
and procedures and establish a uniform set of guidelines and procedures.
As part of the conflict management process, the CFO also said he
needed a way to individually address the different liability risks
in each division. WorkRelationships helped the human resource department
prioritize the immediate employment risks and develop a training
strategy for the various division audiences. For instance, the construction
division immediately received supervisory training on the various
legal responsibilities of managers, including how to defuse threatening
situations, how to respond to offensive behavior complaints, and
how to identify and refer substance abuse problems. The real estate
division focused on developing an ethics compliance program that
addressed similar issues as well as more general ethical issues
pertinent to the real estate industry.
|
|
Results: Due to the prehire drug screening and management
identification-and-referral training, substance abuse in this construction
company was reduced by 20 percent in six months. Workplace violence
assaults were also reduced by 40 percent due to the implementation
of the construction division training program and background and
reference checking system. In the real estate division, management
turnover, the primary concern, was reduced by 10 percent after the
company implemented a management development and retention program.
|
|
ROI: Company Z was experiencing
increasing violence in the workplace. Over 200 employee assault
complaints a year thoughout its 14,000 employees. Entering this
figure plus anticipated assaults over the next year the cost to
this company was calcultated to be $63,000,000. By implementing
WorkRelationships recommendations Company Z could save themselves
$22,507,380.
|
|
Click to see sample calculations:
|
|